Insights
AI in Legal Contract Drafting: A Detailed Analysis

AI in Legal Contract Drafting: A Detailed Analysis
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in legal services is no longer a distant concept; it has gained traction as a practical tool, particularly in contract drafting. This development is profoundly significant because both the legal profession and AI rely heavily on language—generating words, crafting reasoning, and constructing arguments.
With AI tools such. This article will explore the key benefits, practical concerns, regulatory context, and future best practices for using AI in legal contract drafting, tailored to legal professionals aiming to integrate these advancements.
The Rationale for AI in Contract Drafting
Increased Efficiency
One of the most notable advantages of using AI in drafting contracts is the efficiency it offers. AI systems process vast amounts of information in mere minutes, generating initial drafts that once required hours of human labour. This efficiency enables legal professionals to allocate their time to more complex and high-value tasks.
Error Reduction
AI tools are particularly effective at minimising minor errors such as typographical or formatting mistakes. However, it is essential to note that while AI systems excel in reducing these smaller issues, they are also prone to “hallucinations,” where fictitious data or fabricated details are confidently presented. This inherent risk underscores the importance of rigorous oversight and validation, which will be discussed later in this article.
Cost Savings
For legal practices handling commoditized or standardised contracts, AI-driven efficiency offers substantial cost savings, creating opportunities to reduce fees for clients. This cost reduction particularly benefits smaller businesses and individuals who may have previously found legal services inaccessible. Additionally, it allows firms to explore new revenue streams by catering to markets constrained by historically prohibitive legal costs.
Enhanced Accuracy and Risk Mitigation
AI platforms significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of legal drafts by referencing extensive databases of case law, precedents, and statutory provisions. Automated tools such as CoCounsel and Lexis+ AI ensure that drafts are substantiated with up-to-date references, enhancing the robustness of legal documents and minimising compliance risks. By streamlining the due diligence process, AI-powered tools elevate the quality of contract drafting while reducing exposure to potential litigation.
Challenges and Concerns in AI-Assisted Contract Drafting
Ethical and Practical Concerns
AI “hallucinations” where systems generate non-existent or inaccurate details can lead to significant risks if outputs are not carefully validated. Additionally, AI’s reliance on training data means that any biases in historical data can infiltrate the output, raising ethical concerns. Over-reliance on AI without adequate oversight risks compromising the quality and integrity of legal advice.
Compliance and Regulatory Limitations
At present, the UK has declined to implement overarching regulations on the use of AI, adopting a ‘wait and see’ approach in an attempt to promote innovation. AI regulation is governed by existing data protection laws which were not designed with AI in mind, and also industry specific legislation and regulations. It should be noted that the SRA has taken a similar approach in declining to regulate, instead relying on existing rules and publishing guidance on best practice.
Contrast this with the EU’s arguably more cautious approach, implementing AI specific regulations in August 2024 which aimed to categorise and regulate the use of AI. The contrast in approaches along with the UK’s refusal to sign a recent international treaty on the regulation of AI signal that the UK aims to create competitive legislative landscape allowing professionals to innovate and gain an advantage over more regulated competitors in the short to medium term.
As the legal industry adapts, insurers will follow. It is therefore important that firms continue to consult their indemnity policies for any clauses relating to the use of AI or limiting liability in the event that a claim is brought due to the use of AI.
It is critical for firms to employ AI platforms that are GDPR and Data Protection compliant, ensuring client data is secure. Using systems that process data locally or on closed platforms can mitigate risks, but the inherent opacity of AI systems makes it challenging to verify compliance entirely.
Future Considerations and Best Practices
Embedding Transparency and Accountability
Law firms must prioritise transparency in all AI-assisted processes. Clients should be clearly informed about how AI systems contribute to their legal services, including safeguards to maintain data security and output accuracy. Updated engagement letters, terms of business, and client care documents should explicitly address the role of AI. Ensuring that all AI-generated outputs undergo review by qualified professionals will be critical in maintaining trust and professional standards.
Human Oversight
Adopting a human-in-the-loop approach remains indispensable. AI can streamline processes and produce initial drafts, but the final review, validation, and sign-off must rest with experienced legal professionals. This human oversight ensures ethical considerations, nuanced understanding, and professional judgment remain integral to every contract.
The Importance of AI Literacy
For AI to be an effective tool, legal practitioners must understand its capabilities and limitations. Comprehensive AI literacy training will equip professionals to critically assess outputs, identify hallucinations, and address compliance issues effectively. This training is not only necessary for mitigating risks but also for staying competitive in an evolving industry.
Anticipating Client Expectations
Clients’ attitudes towards AI are expected to vary. Cost-conscious clients may demand AI-driven efficiencies, while organisations in highly regulated industries may seek verifiable compliance assurances before accepting AI use. Early adoption of transparent workflows that balance innovative technology with regulatory compliance can give firms a significant competitive advantage, appealing to both progressive and risk-averse clients.
Legal professionals can no longer afford to overlook the transformative potential of AI in contract drafting. By embedding transparency, ethical oversight, and accountability into AI workflows, firms can balance innovation with client trust and regulatory compliance. At CJCH, we are committed to guiding organisations through this evolving landscape, ensuring the successful integration of AI while safeguarding professional standards.
If your firm is exploring how AI can enhance its contract drafting process, our team of experts is here to help. Contact the CJCH team today to understand practical AI solutions and build future-proof governance frameworks.
We are rated as ‘Excellent on Trustpilot, learn about our latest reviews here.